| |
Chapter 1: The Paralegal in Civil
Litigation...............................................................
1
Chapter 2: Technology in Civil
Litigation...................................................................
6
Chapter 3: The Court
System....................................................................................
12
Chapter 4: Client Interviews & Investigation in
Civil Litigation............................. 19
Chapter 5: Organizing & Managing Civil
Litigation................................................ 26
Chapter 6: Electronic
Research.................................................................................
33
Chapter 7:
Evidence...................................................................................................
39
Chapter 8: Settlement & Alternative Dispute
Resolution....................................... 45
Chapter 9: Pleadings: Complaint, Summons and
Service........................................ 54
Chapter 10: Pleadings: Responses to the
Complaint.............................................. 60
Chapter 11: Introduction to
Discovery......................................................................
66
Chapter 12: Issues in Electronic
Discovery..............................................................
72
Chapter 13: Interrogatories and Requests or
Production........................................ 78
Chapter 14:
Depositions.............................................................................................
85
Chapter 15: Other Forms of
Discovery.....................................................................
91
Chapter 16: Trial Preparation – Postdiscovery to
Pretrial....................................... 95
Chapter 17:
Trial......................................................................................................
102
Chapter 18: The Electronic Courtroom & Trial
Presentation................................ 111
Chapter 19: Post trial
Procedures............................................................................
116
Chapter 20: Enforcement of
Judgments..................................................................
125
Chapter One
The Paralegal in
Civil Litigation
The chapter orients the student to the “specialty” of litigation
paralegal by:
1. Discussing the role of litigation in the legal system;
2. Preparing a paralegal student to be part of a legal
team;
3. Introducing the use of technology in the litigation
process.
The challenge for all litigation courses is to concentrate on the
substantive & procedural aspects of trial while encouraging students to
view their future roles as part of a team, which will generally be
located in a business that earns money. Whether working for the
plaintiff or defendant, in a small or large firm, the litigation
paralegal roles will include some constants, as well as many variables.
We will try to identify those aspects of litigation which are universal,
and explore some variations, as well.
II. Chapter One Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, the student should be able to:
1. Describe the role of the
paralegal in civil litigation.
2. List and describe
necessary skills for a litigation paralegal.
3. List and describe the
tasks performed by the civil litigation paralegal.
|
Scenario Case Study Questions |
|
1. |
Sharing information between the offices should include issues
such as networking computer systems (WAN), the “need to know”
issues raised by any conflicts of interest, ESI (Electronically
Stored Information) and remote access by all members of a legal
team, and security issues to protect confidentiality. |
|
2. |
Should show the lead attorney as having line authority, and have
clear reporting & supervisory channels. The multi-office
interface should be clear. |
|
3. |
Documents, exhibits, calendars (deadlines should be tickled),
witnesses, timelines, etc. |
|
4. |
Experience in client communications (the trauma & loss argue for
extra sensitivity in interviews), organization (complexity of
multiple parties, enormous quantities of information, multiple
deadlines, etc.), ability to do research, both factual & legal,
good computer skills, discovery experience, and familiarity with
the Rules of Civil Procedure would be good starting points. |
|
5. |
If they are working on the same case, as long as they don’t
discuss it outside the office setting, no problem! |
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL LITIGATION
|
Civil litigation involves real disputes between parties seeking
a remedy for a civil wrong or to enforce a contract |
|
THE ROLE OF THE PARALEGAL IN CIVIL LITIGATION |
Civil litigation is a process that requires the assembly of
information and evidence, analysis of facts and law, preparation
of material for trial presentation, post trial appeals and
execution judgments.
Maintaining positive client relationships is a critical area of
the practice of law.
The paralegal is a member of a legal team comprised of lawyers,
who supervise the team, which may be made up of law firm
partners, associates, and legal support staff.
Corporate paralegals typically serve in a supervisory role
coordinating between in-house counsel and litigation counsel.
The increased use of technology has led to the paralegal serving
as any litigation support manager, or coordinating and
facilitating the technology needs of the legal team. |
|
SKILLS OF THE PARALEGAL |
Skills needed by a paralegal are varied and depend on the nature
of the legal specialty. Skills common to all paralegals include
resourcefulness, commitment, analytical skills, interpersonal
skills, communication skills, professionalism, human relations
skills, and soft skills. |
|
THE CIVIL LITIGATION PARALEGAL TASKS |
Civil litigation paralegals may be called upon to perform many
tasks, including interviewing clients and witnesses,
investigating facts, organizing and managing case files,
drafting pleadings and other documents, assisting at trial, and
administrative tasks including conflict checking and keeping. |
VI. Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
The lead attorney should have the ultimate responsibility; the
paralegal may be the coordinator of in-house, outside counsel
partnerships. |
|
2. |
Should address the IT aspects of present-day litigation, and the
cost-effectiveness of using lower billing members of the team.
Also, mention UPL as a reason for utilizing paralegals for tasks
like discovery, organization – frees up the attorney for
depositions, settlement meetings & court time. |
|
3. |
Should center around communications & organization, both
traditional & electronic. |
|
4. |
Maintaining case files, preparing/managing discovery,
interviewing & investigation, client contact, locating &
preparing witnesses, organizing materials for trial (trial
notebook, litigation management software), preparing exhibits
for trial, maintaining a tickler system for the project, and
serving as an IT assistant in settlement conferences & trial. |
VI. Terms & Definitions
|
Civil litigation |
Involves legal disputes between parties seeking a remedy for a
civil wrong or to enforce a contract. |
|
Paralegal |
Support staff of the lawyer . |
|
Lawyers |
Are law school graduates who have passed the bar examination and
hold a license to practice law having met the minimum
qualifications established by the individual jurisdictions or
courts for obtaining a license to practice and represent
clients. |
|
Partners |
Are lawyers who have an ownership interest in the law firm. They
have a stake in the profits of the law firm. |
|
Associates |
Are non-owner lawyers, usually salaried employees of the law
firm. |
|
Managing partner |
Is the partner responsible for managing the business operations
of the firm such as taking care of the facilities, management,
human resources supervision, and public relations for the firm. |
|
Supervising lawyer |
Is the member of the legal team to whom all others on the team
report and who has the ultimate responsiobility for the actions
of the legal team. |
|
Support staff |
Are the other members of the law office providing support
functions to the legal team; includes law librarians, legal
secretaries, receptionists, information technologist,
bookkeepers, and mailroom personnel. |
|
Soft skills |
Term used to refer to the skills sometimes called people skills
or human relations skills. |
|
Resourcefulness |
The ability to meet and handle a situation and find solutions to
problems. |
|
Commitment |
Finishing what one starts out to do or complete. |
|
Analytical skills |
Allow one to follow a step-by-step process to solve a problem. |
|
Interpersonal skills |
Ability to work with people, are vital to paralegal success, as
well as to success in other endeavors. |
|
Communications skills |
Expressing ideas effectively. |
|
Professionalism |
A way a professional is expected to approach their job in a
professional way and conduct themselves in a professional
manner. |
|
Inside corporate counsel |
Generally, those who select the outside law firms and monitor
the handling of the civil litigation. |
|
Conflict of interest |
Interests or loyalties may appear to be divided. |
Chapter Two
Technology in
Civil Litigation
Notes
This Chapter discusses the ways technology has had an impact on the law
office & courthouse. It addresses ethical issues and economic
considerations, preparing the student for specific applications,
software & security issues to be addressed throughout the book.
As always, the variables are staggering. The size & resources of a firm
will provide some parameters for the degree of technology employed, but
some small, boutique firms may be on the cutting edge of the available
hard- & software. Some jurisdictions are well-equipped to handle
sophisticated courtroom presentations; others consider a video
deposition “high tech”.
Students need to be aware of both the resources that are likely to be
available and the resources that may be, for the average firm,
aspirational. Technological advances make yesterday’s pipe dream into
today’s standard operating equipment.
II. Chapter Two Objectives
After studying this
chapter, you should be able to:
1.
Explain the uses of technology in the law office as it applies to civil
litigation.
2.
Explain the ethical issues in civil litigation as they apply to members
of the litigation team.
3.
Recognize areas of security concern in the use of the computer and the
Internet in the practice of law.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
With two separate and growing offices, Ethan Benjamin, as the
partner with the most technical knowledge, was being looked upon
as the one to organize and establish a practices and procedure
manual for the two office firm of Mason, Marshall & Benjamin
dealing with technology issues in civil litigation. The distance
separating the offices made commuting between the offices
impractical. On a good day, with traffic, it could take over an
hour, and on a bad day, with bad weather, it could be two hours.
The two offices had to work together on many of the cases
because they did not have enough work, or financial resources to
hire extra staff or attorneys. Mrs. Hannah was the most senior
of the staff and the office manager and administrator of the
firm. She had given up a position at a downtown office to work
in the suburban office at a reduction in salary just to avoid
the time and stress of the daily commute and was not willing to
relocate. She needed access to the time and billing records from
both offices to prepare bills and make sure all the expenses
were properly monitored and paid. |
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. How do legal teams manage the documents required for
litigation?
2. How do the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply to
electronic documents? |
|
|
IV. Summary
|
TECHNOLOGY IN CIVIL LITIGATION |
Technology in the law office, courthouse, and courtroom has
changed the way many traditional procedures are performed.
Computers are now used for maintaining old types of records,
communications, research, filing of documents and in trial
presentations.
The revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have
imposed new obligations on the legal team and the deadlines for
the taking of electronic discovery.
Larger offices usually have a technical support staff to handle
questions and issues about the use and implementation of
technology.
Paralegals are frequently called upon to work with independent
computer, software, and multimedia consultants. |
|
ETHICAL ISSUES OF THE LEGAL TEAM |
Ethical behavior is expected and required of every member of the
legal team. Ethical rules are minimum standards of behavior that
apply equally to the attorney, the paralegal, and the other
members of the legal team. Among the ethical obligations are
those of competency and confidentiality.
The attorney–client privilege is a rule of evidence that
protects the client from having the attorney required to reveal
confidential information. All members of the legal team are
obligated to keep all client information, from whatever source
it is learned, confidential in the realization that unless the
client gives informed consent or except when impliedly
authorized such as by statute.
It is now accepted that the attorney–client privilege applies to
all members of the legal team.
The work product doctrine provides a limited protection for
materials prepared by a legal team in anticipation of litigation
or for trial.
Loyalty to the client is the essence of the ethical rule that
prohibits conflicts of interest, and conflict of interest
provides that a lawyer shall not represent a client if the
representation will be directly adverse to another client's
interests, with some exceptions. |
|
COMPUTERS AND NETWORK SECURITY |
Computer security is a critical issue for the law office and the
courts. The legal team must understand the use of firewalls to
limit access to computers and computer networks and the use of
encryption technology to put a “lock" around computer
information.
Computer antivirus programs are essential to protect computers
from malicious programs that can attack and destroy computer
programs and occasionally hardware. |
V.
PowerPoints Available
|
Title |
|
|
1.
Technology in Litigation |
13. In-House IT Staff |
|
2.
Typical Law Office Uses |
14. In-House IT Staff, con’t |
|
3.
Typical Law Office Uses, con’t. |
15. Outside IT Consultants |
|
4.
Document Storage |
16. Outside IT Issues |
|
5.
Delivery |
18. Courthouse Technologist |
|
6.
On-line Storage & Collaboration |
19. Outsourcing Tasks |
|
7.
Secure Remote Access |
20. Competency |
|
8.
Computer & Network Security |
21. Confidentiality & Privilege |
|
9.
Firewalls & Encryption |
22. Work Product |
|
10.
Computer Viruses |
23. Exceptions |
|
11.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure |
24. Extension of Privilege to Agents |
|
12.
Technology Support |
25. Conflict of Interest |
VI. Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
The speed in which cases move to trial, and the ubiquitous
presence of electronically drafted documents has been addressed
by the most recent rules. The real question that remains is
what the new requirements are for retention, litigation holds &
the archiving of documents. |
|
2. |
In addition to law office requirements, paralegals may serve as
liaisons to other firms in discovery, multiple jurisdiction
suits, and as technological assistants in the courtroom. |
|
3. |
Making sure the firm has
·
compatible software (office suites & specialty
applications)
·
adequate hardware to handle the volume & speed
required
·
adequate ESI systems, with access to all offices
and remote access from courthouses, etc.
·
specialty programs to handle discover needs
·
software that is compatible with the local courts
·
security: passwords, encryption, firewalls, virus
& spyware protection |
|
4. |
In addition to the general ethical rules, be sure that the
possibility of conflict with outside IT is mentioned. |
|
5. |
In addition to the conflict of interest, there’s confidentiality
& competence. |
|
6. |
This centers around the belief that a relationship has begun is
more important than subsequent employment, and that a paralegal
can establish an implied relationship, too. |
|
7. |
This concentrates on the need for it to be prepared for specific
litigation, rather than as part of general representation. |
|
8. |
Yes – with proper arguments. The agency analysis argues yes. |
|
9. |
Should highlight the special difficulties involving reviewing
documents and redacting protected material. |
|
10. |
Particular attention should be paid to discovery conferences &
court orders involving discovery or settlement/trial
presentations. |
|
11. |
Mention should be made of privilege & confidentiality. Security
methods will include encryption, passwords, virus & spyware
checking & firewalls. |
VI.
Terms & Definitions
|
Confidentiality |
Security of documents. |
|
Smoking gun |
A document on which the case hinges that may be introduced into
evidence. |
|
Electronic repository |
Files stored electronically in a secure protected file server to
which everyone authorized has access over the internet. |
|
On- line collaboration |
Using the internet to work collaboratively |
|
IT |
Technical support staff that handles questions and issues about
the use and implementation of technology, computers, and
software. |
|
Remote access |
A way to support potential application issues |
|
Outsourcing |
Buzzword for shipping work out of the office or overseas to save
money. |
|
Attorney- client privileges |
Rule of evidence that protects the client from the attorney
being required to reveal the confidential information. |
|
Work product doctrine |
Provides a limited protection for material prepared by the
attorney, or those working for the attorney, in anticipation of
litigation or for trial. |
|
Conflict of interest |
Representation of one client will be directly adverse to another
client. |
|
Agents |
Legal assistants, accountants, and other experts of the lawyer. |
|
Hacking |
Unauthorized parties gaining access to the computer network.
|
|
Firewall |
Is a program designed to limit access to a computer or to a
computer network system. |
|
Encryption |
Permits a computer user to basically put a lock around its
computer information to protect it from being discovered by
others. |
|
Viruses |
Range from those that create minor inconvenience to those that
can destroy data and cause computer shutdowns. |
Chapter Three
The Court System
Notes
This chapter is an orientation to the court system from the perspective
of the litigation paralegal, which gives some practical context to the
usual Introduction to the Law information.
It would be advisable to contrast your state & local rules with each
discussion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Sometimes there are
important, obvious differences (20 days for response v. 28 days, for
instance), but sometimes the differences are in the application, not the
rules themselves. Are continuances frequently denied or granted? Are
format variations tolerated, or do they strike a death knell? While
some of these variations may be judge-specific, others are generally
known, and relied upon, throughout a jurisdiction.
II. Chapter Three Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1.
Identify
and describe
the sources of American law.
2.
Understand the need to prove the elements of a cause of action.
3.
Describe the various remedies available to redress civil causes of
action.
4.
Describe the elements necessary to establish jurisdiction and venue for
a particular court.
5.
Describe the courts in the federal and state court systems.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
Owen Mason, Esq., called his partners Ariel and Ethan on a
conference call linking the two offices to tell them about the
new case he had just signed up. They had been asked to represent
all the passengers and the families of the children injured in a
significant motor vehicle accident involving a school bus. As
part of the initial interview Owen had obtained the initial
state police investigation report with the names and addresses
of all parties involved as well as those of the potential
defendants. It was clear to him that there was a potential
question of diversity of citizenship, and the damages were far
in excess of the federal rules for jurisdiction. The question
they had to decide was which of the potential courts was most
desirable for bringing an action of this type. Jury awards were
being published on numerous websites and
in
hard copy journals and he had a concern as to whether the
clients would be best served by filing suit in one of the state
courts or in the federal court.
|
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. What is meant by “the law”?
2. What is the purpose of requiring courts to have jurisdiction
to hear a case?
|
|
Scenario Case Study Questions |
|
1. |
Certainly the scope of the suit, number of parties, and
considerations of the jurisdiction’s tort law (caps on damages?)
are considerations, along with the usual state/federal analysis. |
|
2. |
The goal is to maximize the possible judgment for the client
while not “forum shopping” to intentionally put the opposing
party at a disadvantage. |
|
3. |
The cost of long-distance litigation has been reduced by the use
of electronic communications, but there should be some
discussion of the convenience, the need for outside counsel if
the litigation is multi-jurisdictional. |
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURT SYSTEM |
Courts are the ultimate place for the resolution of civil
disputes in a neutral location |
|
SOURCES OF AMERICAN LAW |
There are four primary sources of American law: constitutions,
statutes, administrative rules and regulations, and case law. |
|
CAUSE OF ACTION |
A cause of action is a wrong that is legally recognized as a
basis for compensating a person for harm caused by another.
The two main areas of the civil causes of action are torts and
contracts.
Torts are civil wrongs that are not breaches of contract for
which the court can fashion a remedy.
There are four elements of a negligence action:
1.
Duty of care
2.
Breach of the duty of care
3.
Causation
4.
Damages
The elements of a breach of contract action are:
1.
Offer
2.
Acceptance
3.
Meeting of the minds
4.
Consideration
5.
Lawful purpose
6.
Competent parties
7.
Breach
8.
Damages
|
|
REMEDIES |
Civil remedies include money damages and equitable relief,
including specific performance and injunction. |
|
JURISDICTION |
Jurisdiction is the power of the court to hear a case where a
person has standing to bring a lawsuit in an actual dispute or
controversy for which the specific court has subject matter
jurisdiction to hear and decide the particular type of dispute.
Some courts have limited jurisdiction; they are authorized to
hear only certain types of disputes. Other courts have general
jurisdiction, which gives them the power to hear all types of
matters.
Before a court will act it must have personal jurisdiction,
authority over the person as well as subject matter
jurisdiction.
Long arm statutes give the courts power over parties who reside
in other states but had utilized some state service or facility
that subjects them to the jurisdiction of that court. |
|
Venue |
Venue refers to the court that is the most convenient for the
witnesses or parties to have the case tried of all of the courts
that have jurisdiction over the persons involved and the subject
matter. |
|
ORGANIZATION OF THE COURT SYSTEM |
State and federal court systems have trial courts where evidence
and testimony are presented to a finder of fact, intermediate
appellate courts that review the procedural and substantive
issues raised in the trial court, and an ultimate court of
appeals which in the federal system is the Supreme Court of the
United States. |
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
Basic government questions
-- the answers should at least touch on: |
|
1.
|
Constitutions, federal & state, and some legislative grants of
power, as well as court rules from the judicial branch |
|
2.
|
Citizens of different state, $75,000 minimum, mention of
determining complete diversity |
|
3.
|
Variety of responses, perhaps including convenience, speed,
costs, damage limits in various courts. |
|
4.
|
Constitutions, statutes, administrative rules & regulations,
case law |
|
5.
|
Legislative enactments |
|
6.
|
Rules & regulations |
|
7.
|
Promulgating the rules/regulations required to carry out their
legislated mandate |
|
8.
|
Opinions of appellate (or in rare cases trial) court decisions |
|
9.
|
Using previous decisions as a basis for current decisions |
|
10.
|
A wrong that is legally recognized as a basis for compensating a
person for a loss |
|
11.
|
Special damages are easily documented, general damages are more
speculative |
|
12.
|
Compensatory damages make the plaintiff “whole”, while punitive
damages look to the defendant, in an effort to discourage future
conduct. |
|
13.
|
People have standing to sue if they have a personal stake in the
outcome of the controversy. |
|
14.
|
Courts do not give advisory opinions – there must be a real
controversy for the court to hear it. NOTE: The mootness issue
raised in abortion cases, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113
(1972), makes an interesting discussion of this concept. |
|
15.
|
The power to hear a particular type of case. |
|
16.
|
General jurisdiction courts hear all civil & criminal matters
brought before them (although there may be minimum amounts
required to be in controversy, and the criminal issue must have
arisen from the laws of that jurisdiction) |
|
17.
|
Should include both service of process & long-arm/in rem
considerations |
|
18.
|
Of the courts that have jurisdiction, venue picks the one that
is (generally) most convenient. NOTE: a review of the “change
of venue” decision in Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333
(1966) could be useful. |
|
19.
|
To settle a dispute. |
|
20.
|
To correct errors of law that occurred during trial |
|
21.
|
Permission to bring a case, granted by the highest court, to
which a party does not generally have a RIGHT of appeal |
VI. Terms & Definitions
|
Diversity of citizenship |
Cases involving citizens from different states. |
|
Constitution |
Document that establishes the conception, character, and
organization of a government, the fundamental and organic law. |
|
Executive branch |
One of the three co-equal branches created by the Constitution
in which power is shared. |
|
Judicial branch |
One of the three co-equal branches created by the Constitution
in which power is shared |
|
Legislative branch |
One of the three co-equal branches created by the Constitution
in which power is shared |
|
Statutes |
Enactments by the legislative branch that include provisions to
define and regulate the conduct of its citizens. |
|
Case law |
Written decision by a court, which resolves the particular legal
dispute before the court. |
|
Stare decisis |
The system of using prior case law decisions for making current
decisions. |
|
Cause of action |
Wrong that is legally recognized as a basis for compensating one
for the harms suffered. |
|
Elements |
Makes up the cause of action and defines that cause of action. |
|
Plaintiff |
Must prove each element of the cause of action. |
|
Preponderance of the evidence |
Evidence of the greater weight. |
|
Torts |
Civil wrongs the court can fashion a remedy. |
|
Negligence |
Cause of action in which plaintiff claims that another person’s
failure to act as a reasonable person would have acted under the
same or similar circumstances caused injury for which the
plaintiff should be awarded and damages. |
|
Defendant |
A
person against whom a legal action is brought. |
|
Duty of care |
Not be the cause of a risk of harm. |
|
Strict liability |
Plaintiff is not required to prove a breach of duty of care
because the proof is solely within the possession of the
defendant or the caused injury is unreasonably dangerous to the
user of the product. |
|
Contract |
Any agreement that is enforceable in a court of law.
|
|
Statute of frauds |
Certain contracts must be in writing to be enforceable.
|
|
Monetary remedies |
Assign a financial value to the harm suffered by the plaintiff. |
|
Compensatory damages |
Seek to calculate a monetary value for the actual loss suffered
by the plaintiff. |
|
Special damages |
Can be calculated with some level of accuracy. |
|
General damages |
Related to the injury sustained but are not calculated with any
particular formula or accuracy. |
|
Punitive damages |
Designed to punish the defendant for behavior that shocks the
conscience of the finder of fact. |
|
Equitable remedy |
Order the neighbor to remove the fence or relocate it to the
actual boundary line. |
|
Specific performance |
Court orders someone to do something. |
|
Injunction |
Court orders someone to stop doing something. |
|
Jurisdiction |
Who initiates an action, what types of disputes may be brought
before the court, and what authority the court has to resolve
disputes. |
|
Standing |
Describes the plaintiff’s right to bring a lawsuit. |
|
Subject matter jurisdiction |
Authority of a court to hear and decide a particular type of
dispute. |
|
Limited jurisdiction |
Many jurisdictions the trial courts are authorized to hear
certain types of disputes. |
|
General jurisdiction |
Courts having the power to hear all types of matters. |
|
Personal jurisdiction (in personam)(16) |
Requires the court to have authority over the persons as well as
the subject matter of the lawsuit. |
|
In
rem jurisdiction |
Court may hear any dispute concerning property, such as title to
real estate or ownership of personal property such as a painting
or other tangible property, located within the geographic
jurisdiction of the court. |
|
Long arm statutes |
Laws enacted by a state’s legislative body to extend
jurisdiction over parties who reside in other states but have
utilized some state service or facility that subjects them to
the jurisdiction of the state. |
|
Minimum contacts |
Defendant has established contact with a state to the extent
that it is not unreasonable to expect the defendant might use
that state’s court or be required to defend a lawsuit in that
jurisdiction. |
|
Venue |
Court will be selected for purposes of filing a lawsuit. |
|
Concurrent jurisdiction |
Federal and state courts both have subject matter and personal
jurisdiction. |
|
Procedural laws |
Body of law that governs how a case is filed and tried. |
|
Substantive law |
Concerns the application of statues and case law which determine
the rights and obligations of the plaintiff and defendant. |
|
Removal |
Change of a legal case from one court to another based on a
motion by one of the parties stating that the other jurisdiction
is more appropriate for the case. |
|
Courts of record |
Courts in which the testimony and evidence presented are
recorded and preserved. |
|
Appellate courts |
Review the record from the trial court to determine if the trial
judge made an error in applying the procedural or substantive
law. |
|
Affirm |
Appellate courts may agree with the trial court. |
|
Reverse |
Appellate courts may disagree and change the decision previously
made at the trial court level. |
|
Remand |
Sending the case back to the trial court to take further
testimony and either make new findings of fact or make new
applications of law. |
Chapter Four
Client Interviews
& Investigation in Civil Litigation
Notes
Chapter four explores one of the most important paralegal skills.
However, students may not have a healthy skepticism of eyewitness
accounts. It might be beneficial to have each half of the class view a
short scene from a different action movie, and be interviewed by the
other half. Once the statements are taken, show the scenes. Did the
interviewee remember the details correctly? Did the interviewer form a
fairly accurate mental picture of the event? You can add in issues of
gender, ethnicity, lack of cooperation, obvious body language, etc., to
help expose students to these before they have to meet with a real
client or witness!
It may be helpful to have peer-evaluated mini-interviews, to help
students feel comfortable in the process. The peer-evaluations help the
evaluators become aware of some of the requirements for a good
interview, since constructive criticism is an excellent learning tool.
Students may not be as nervous or self-conscious if they are observed by
one or two fellow students, rather than the whole class or the
professor.
II. Chapter Four Objectives
After studying this
chapter you should be able to:
1.
Explain the importance of the initial contact with clients and
witnesses.
2.
Explain the considerations and steps in preparing for an
interview of any client or witness.
3.
Describe the skills necessary to successfully conduct a client or
witness interview.
4.
Explain how expert witnesses are used in litigation.
5.
Explain the steps in conducting an investigation of a claim.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
The partners in the firm, Owen Mason, Ariel Marshall, and Ethan
Benjamin called a firm meeting with the staff from both of the
offices to discuss a new case. It was unusual for them to
convene a meeting of everyone, so the support staff were anxious
and concerned until word got out it was about a major new case.
The firm had just been contacted about handling a major case
involving a school bus accident that resulted in fatal injuries
to some passengers and serious injuries to others. They
assembled in the firm’s center city office to review the steps
and assign the responsibilities for handling the new lawsuit.
The firm had been approached and consented to represent all the
passengers in the accident and their families.
The firm’s paralegals Caitlin and Emily raised
concerns about interviewing the injured children and the parents
of the deceased children who had been in the bus. They wanted to
be certain that each client was properly interviewed, and all
the necessary investigations concluded before filing suit. The
nature of the claims and potential damages lead the partners in
the firm to decide the federal court offered the best place to
try the case. Mr. Mason as the partner most familiar with the
federal courts was concerned about the time limitations for
additional investigation after the suit was filed and the
defendants served. Staff resources were not unlimited as in some
of the bigger firms, and it was certain that a large litigation
firm with virtually unlimited resources would be representing
the defendant individuals and corporations. Everything had to be
completed as much as possible before commencing suit. |
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. Is an interview a confirmation of already known information,
or should it produce unexpected answers?
2. Is it always better to tape record an interview for maximum
accuracy?
|
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO CLIENT INTERVIEWS AND INVESTIGATION
|
Trial preparation starts with the first client contact and the
gathering of the first document. The initial contact with a
client or potential witness may set the tone for the interview
and willingness of the person to cooperate. |
|
PREPARING FOR THE INTERVIEW
|
Investigation checklists should not be viewed as static
documents. Physical surroundings in the interview location can
set the tone for the interview.
Dress and appearance, clothing, posture, and manner of greeting
create the first impression
Communication skills in a multicultural society require that
interviewers develop an ability to appreciate differences in how
and why individuals act and react differently. |
|
CONDUCTING THE INTERVIEW
|
The paralegal must in the first meeting make it clear that he or
she is a paralegal and not an attorney and that only an attorney
can give legal advice.
Listening skills require the ability to listen to what is being
said and not just the words being used. Good listening skills
include the ability to avoid distractions and not make
assumptions about the facts of the case.
Leading questions are those that suggest the desired answer.
Open-ended questions are designed to give interviewees an
opportunity to tell their story without the limitation of a yes
or no answer. |
|
MORAL VERSES ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
|
Moral obligations are ones based on one's own conscience or
perceived rules of correct conduct. Ethical obligations for the
paralegal are based upon the Model Rules of Professional
Conduct. |
|
EXPERT WITNESSES
|
Experts are individuals whose background, education, and
experience are such that the court recognizes them as qualified
to give an opinion based on a set of facts.
Some law firms retain an expert to advise them but do not use
that expert to testify. |
|
INVESTIGATING CLAIMS
|
The legal team must gather all of the relevant information about
a cause of action before making a recommendation to a client
whether to file a lawsuit or respond to a claim of wrongdoing. A
defense perspective requires the legal team to anticipate the
potential defenses.
Official reports associated with all litigation that must be
obtained and analyzed including verification of the physical
aspects of the case.
Tangible evidence consists of physical objects that may have
caused the injury. Loss or destruction of physical evidence may
lead to a claim of spoliation of evidence and an adverse
inference or sanctions from the court.
Timelines can be used to view the physical events leading up to
the incident and offer a graphic representation. |
|
Freedom of information act |
The Freedom of Information Act is a federal statute designed to
open to the public information possessed by the federal
government and its agencies.
Individual agencies may not make available certain types of
information. |
|
Locating witnesses |
Witnesses may be located from official reports, directories, and
the Web. |
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
Basic government questions -- the answers should at least touch on: |
|
1.
|
The screening interview must at the very least produce the
information needed to determine
·
whether the firm can handle this type of case
(resources, competence, etc.)
·
whether there appears to be a legitimate cause of
action, not a frivolous claim
·
if there is a conflict of interest (conflicts
checking)
|
|
2.
|
This should include background preparation (reviewing the file,
online searches for information) and physical preparation
(notice, attire, location, etc.), and perhaps a mention of
back-up equipment (if the attorney has instructed that it be
recorded), and ordinary supplies like pens, pencils, notepads,
computer, etc. Also, determining an off-site location, allowing
time to get there, and being prepared to find and pay for
parking. |
|
3.
|
Should mention both the comfort of the interviewee & the
professionalism of the interviewer. |
|
4.
|
This needs to be discussed in depth, but should emphasize
respect. |
|
5.
|
Observing non-verbal cues can help determine the level of
comfort the witness is feeling, and give some insight into his
or her credibility. |
|
6.
|
Leading contains the answer, and may taint the witnesses’
memories, while open-ended allows them to provide the
information they feel is important or they feel comfortable
giving. It’s usually a good opening gambit, leaving leading
questions for depositions or the courtroom. |
|
7.
|
The personal/professional dichotomy can be explored. Where
would they draw the line when the client has a legal right, but
is morally reprehensible? |
|
8.
|
Should mention agents, and that the information was confidential
(no third party, generally), and involved legal representation.
NOTE: A good exercise is having students find out what is
protected & privileged in their jurisdiction, and what can be
shared to prevent a greater harm. How great does the harm have
to be? What if it’s a moral wrong, not a legal one? |
|
9.
|
Certainly as witnesses, but also as advisors who can help
evaluate a case for settlement. |
|
10.
|
Avoid frivolous claims, determine the settlement value, estimate
the possible court awarded damages, determine if there is enough
proof to win a claim. |
|
11.
|
Certainly for purposes of evaluating a case for settlement, and
to prevent surprise in the courtroom. |
|
12.
|
Discuss spoliation, and the intentional alteration or
destruction v. the natural degradation of organic evidence, or
the destruction of evidence in necessary testing. Discuss the
chain of custody issues, and perhaps show an evidence log. |
|
13.
|
Multiple timelines, from different perspectives. You might want
to include a non-chronological narrative in a lecture, and ask
students to sort it out and prepare a visually coherent
timeline. |
|
14.
|
Pull Freedom of Information Act requests from online as
hand-outs. |
|
15.
|
In addition to litigation or document management software,
discuss the types of information that may be needed for a court
case. Demonstrate locating your school or a local shopping
center on
www.earth.google (this may require administrative permission
for a download). Have students try bablefish (the AltaVista
link is very easy) for a translation, find weather conditions
for Kenya or Iceland, and, perhaps most importantly, find the
location, hours of operation, filing fees and local rules for
another jurisdiction’s probate or domestic relations court. |
.
Terms & Definitions
|
Implied attorney-client relationship |
An agreement between attorney and client in which the terms are
not stated or expressed by the parties. |
|
Screening interview |
an initial contact with a client or prospective client, |
|
Cultural sensitivity |
Being aware of the reasons for differences in the way people
behave based on religious and ethnic background and belief
system |
|
Leading questions |
A question asked in a way that prompts the desired answer. |
|
Open-ended questions |
Designed to give interviewees an opportunity to tell their story
without the limitation of yes-or-no answers. |
|
Narrative opportunity |
Created by open-ended questions gives the interviewees a chance
to talk about them selves. |
|
Privileged communication |
Forms of communication not usable at trial unless waived. Forms
of communication are: attorney- client communication,
doctor-patient communication, priest-penitent communication, and
spousal communications during marriage. |
|
Moral obligation |
Based on one’s own conscience or a person’s perceived rules of
correct conduct, generally in the person’s own community. |
|
Ethical obligation |
Responsibilities of the legal team including those acting on
behalf of a supervising attorney, are the responsibilities of
the legal profession under the ABA Model Rules of Professional
Conduct, including thoroughness in representing a client. |
|
Expert witness |
Individuals whose background, education, and experience are such
that courts recognize them as qualified to give opinions based
on a set of facts. |
|
Restatement of the Law Third, Torts |
Negligence requires a breach of duty, strict liability is
without fault in cases where the doctrine applies. |
|
Arbitration |
Process of resolving disputes between people or groups in a
trial. |
|
Tangible evidence |
Consists of physical objects that may have caused the injury. |
|
Spoliation of evidence |
Failure to preserve evidence has resulted in loss of the case by
the plaintiff, and in other cases by the defendant. |
|
Freedom of Information Act |
Federal statute designed to open to the public the information
possessed by the federal government and its agencies. |
Chapter Five
Organizing &
Managing Civil Litigation
Notes
This chapter considers the use of technology in the law office, both as
a business that must cover its expenses and as an instrument of the
legal system. These two functions are not generally juxtaposed in a
paralegal curriculum, and this chapter helps integrate these concepts in
the minds of students who will be employees, as well as litigation
assistants.
Since firms (and students!) widely differ in their ability to use
technology, the chapter provides a general overview of the types of
specialty applications available, and how they apply to both the
operation of a profitable business and the organization of complex
litigation. When are these necessary or desirable, affordable or a
luxury, and, perhaps most importantly, required in order to be zealous
advocates? The answers will depend on the firm, the case, and the
opponent.
II. Chapter Five Objectives
After studying this
chapter you should be able to:
1.
Explain the reasons for the use of software for managing litigation
cases.
2.
Describe the types of specialty applications software programs used in
case management and organization.
3.
Describe how case management programs are used.
4.
Explain how case management software systems can enable the legal team
to collaborate on cases more efficiently.
5.
Explain the role of office management software in the operation of the
law office.
6.
Describe the advantage of time lines in litigation.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
It
was clear to Mrs. Hannah that her role had changed since she
started with Mr. Mason as a paralegal. They now had two office
separated by forty miles and a two-hour rush hour commute. She
had to manage the staff and office administration for both
locations from the suburban office. She slowly began to realize
that she was the one everyone was depending on to coordinate the
activities and operations. After attending an advanced paralegal
education seminar, she realized what the speaker was saying when
he referred to people in her position as the critical Paralegal
Portal in the firm. Her job was: to maintain the relationships
with clients, by keeping them informed; facilitate communication
between the lawyers, opposing counsel, staff and clients; and
insure the litigation team collaborated in an efficient,
effective manner.
Organizing information on cases and litigation was
critical. With the remote operations, each member of the
litigation team had to have a method to access critical
information at any time from either office or even from the
court or home. Ethical issues of conflict of interest were
becoming a concern as new clients came in and the practice grew
and new consultants and legal staff were hired to work on the
cases from other law firms. It was obvious that she could no
longer rely on a paper system; she had to go paperless for the
offices and use software to manage the information and cases. If
nothing else the time and billing functions were now more
essential to the firm’s cash flow needs. Bills had to be
accurately prepared and sent out on a regular basis.
|
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. How do you use computers to help organize your life?
2. What is an example of a timeline you use?
|
|
Scenario Case Study Questions |
|
1. |
The memo should include the exponential nature of document
generation (each party copying each party with each document),
and organizational/access considerations. |
|
2. |
This memo should address the database/search aspects of the
programs. |
|
3. |
Documents, exhibits, calendars (deadlines should be tickled),
witnesses, timelines, etc.. |
|
4. |
The argument should include the amount of time & expertise
needed to design the database v. one that already anticipates
the needs of complex litigation, the integrated features
(full-text searches, coding, etc.), and the capacity to handle
non-text files. |
|
5. |
Highlight the organizational features, templates and searching
aspects, as well as the variety of integrated functions. |
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO CASE
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
|
Office management and case management functions overlap.
Early versions of some software programs were individual
applications, like calendar creation and maintenance programs.
There is a trend toward integrating all of the desired functions
of office and case management and organization into a single
master integrated program. |
|
CASE AND PRACTICE MANAGEMENT |
Efficient use of a case management system provides all
authorized members of the legal team with access to all the case
information day or night.
Computer systems today even permit
members of the legal team to access the same information
from remote locations.
One of the tools in collaborative situations is the individual
assessment of the importance of items in the case.
Clients and the courts prefer or even require members of the
legal team, such as student law clerks and paralegals, to do
work that does not require the skill of the higher billing rate
attorney.
A fee for court approval in some courts for work done by an
attorney that could have been done by a paralegal will be denied
or the fee reduced.
Each member of the team must have the ability to input and use
information for the tasks assigned to them. |
|
SPECIALTY APPLICATIONS SOFTWARE PROGRAMS |
Specialty applications programs combine different software
programs to perform law office case and management functions.
The basic law office management performed are time and billing.
Legal specialty application programs are software programs are
designed for specific legal applications like the management of
cases and law office operations.
A case management software
program offers a convenient method for organizing the parts of a
case in a central repository that can be shared by all members
of the legal team
CaseMap from LexisNexis CaseSoft is a case management and
analysis software
tool that acts as a central repository for critical case
knowledge.
Integrated software
applications like CaseMap allow seamless transfer of
data to other programs, such
as word processors.
Summation
and Concordance are litigation support systems used for
searching and retrieving evidence.
Sanction
and similar programs are used for trial presentation which may
include videotaped depositions, images, and documents.
|
|
MANAGING THE CASE
|
Cases, to the law office, are issues that a client has presented
to a legal team to handle and resolve.
A
case file in a simple case may consist of only a few pages of
information. In a more complex case the case file may consist of
thousands of documents with hundreds of people involved.
Manual case management for the legal team may include the
creation and use of a case notebook and a trial notebook.
Case management software can be used to organize the cast of
characters in a case, the documents, the relevant time table,
issues, legal authority, and other desired information.
Different members of the legal team can obtain information and
enter it into the case management software. |
|
USING CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
|
Complex litigation may involve millions of documents and hundreds of witnesses.
The use of computers for e-mail and document storage by
business and government
has caused a massive increase in the number of potential
documents that may have to be
reviewed, tracked, and made available.
Case
management systems permit collaboration among the members of the
legal team. |
|
TIMELINE GRAPHICS PROGRAMS |
Time lines are chronological listings of the facts of a case
frequently presented in a graphic representation.
|
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
Should center around scheduling, document management, exhibits,
witness information, etc. |
|
2. |
It serves as an organization guide and a checklist that
everything needed to be asked or produced in trial has been
presented, in order to prove the elements of the claim;
organizes material that can be used to impeach credibility. |
|
3. |
One hard copy version creates three problems:
·
Only one person has access to the master copy at
a time
·
It quickly become bulky & burdensome
·
Any changes made on one team member’s version may
not necessary show up on the final version (difficulty in
conforming documents)
|
|
4. |
The ESI material permits simultaneous multiple access or remote
access, takes up less space, and makes searches easier. |
|
5. |
There is some overlap, especially concerning scheduling, contact
information & time-keeping. |
|
6. |
Office management, case management, litigation support,
transcript management, trial presentations. |
|
7. |
Hand-stamped, hand-coded/indexed/digested & carried around in
boxes. |
|
8. |
Interviews, investigation reports, expert reports, research
memos, pleadings, trial preparation & discovery documents. |
|
9. |
There
is a close relationship between law office management and case
management. Some of the functions overlap; for example, contact
management. Many of the functions are duplicated in many of the
specialty applications. |
|
10. |
For billing purposes, but also for practice management purposes
if hourly billing is not being used – what is a profitable
contingent percentage? What area of practice is costing the
firm profits from another area? Which are leveraged to cover
overhead expenses? |
|
11. |
Most of the office functions can be divided into the following
categories:
Calendar
– Keeping personal appointments, case deadlines, statutes of
limitations, and important reminder dates.
Contacts
– Keeping a current list of names, addresses, phone, e-mail
addresses, and other information for clients, opposing counsel,
vendors, networking contacts, and other people and firms.
Files
– Keeping track of individual case files, projects, client
matters, and related documents.
Accounting
– Keeping track of time and billing information, client and firm
funds and escrow accounts, and preparing bills, reports, and tax
returns. |
|
12. |
To prevent sanctions being assessed for failing to meet a
deadline, and, of course, to prevent a client from losing an
important legal right. |
|
13. |
Records can show that there has been proper supervision of
paralegals, preventing UPL claims. |
|
14. |
Case
management can be used to organize the cast of characters in a
case, the documents, time table, issues, legal authority and
other desired information providing the information in an
organized fashion. |
|
15. |
Notes by any member are automatically integrated into a case
file, and it will permit simultaneous or remote access. |
|
16. |
Chronological accounts of an event, often from multiple
perspectives. |
|
17. |
They can visually pinpoint discrepancies between witness
accounts & provide a map of events for the jury. |
|
18. |
See 15. |
|
19. |
See 8. |
|
20. |
See 14 & 15. |
|
21. |
See 17. |
Terms & Definitions
|
Demonstrative evidence |
Physical items such as defective products in a strict liability
action or an automobile in a motor vehicle accident, may have to
be obtained and preserved for examination by expert witnesses or
for use at trial. |
|
Trial notebook |
Summary information about the case is maintained in a notebook
with tabs for each major activity, party, expert, or element of
proof needed. |
|
Paperless office |
Everything, in theory, is available on the computer screen. |
|
Specialty application programs |
Combine many of the basic functions found in software suites,
word processing, database management, spreadsheets, and graphic
presentations to perform law office case and litigation
management |
|
Sanction |
a financial penalty imposed by a
judge on a party or attorney for violation of a court rule, for
receiving a special waiver of a rule, or as a fine for contempt
of court. |
|
Case(s) |
Matters, to the law office, are issues that a client has
presented to a legal team to handle and resolve |
|
Case management program |
Organize the cast of characters in a case, the documents, the
relevant time table, issues, legal authority, and other
desired information |
|
Time line |
Chronological listings of the facts of a case. |
|
Databases |
Collection of similar records such as your address book, which
has a name, address, city, and phone number for each person in
it. |
|
Events |
Appointments, tasks, reminders, or things to do that are
scheduled for specific dates. |
|
Matters |
Refer to any matter, case, file, or project that you need to
track. |
|
Documents |
Previously saved word processing files, scanned images,
pleadings, correspondence, or Internet Web pages. |
|
Time keeping |
Includes the recording of all time spent performing activities
during the workday. |
Chapter Six
Electronic
Research
Notes
This chapter presumes a fairly comprehensive legal research course in
the curriculum, possible a CALR course, as well. Since research is
often a basic course, required early in the curriculum, this will be a
good review of those concepts at a more advanced stage. Integrating the
need for research into the litigation paralegal’s responsibilities is a
more recent development, but we are finding that most of our students
are expected to perform at least simple searches and cite-checking in
even entry-level positions.
Although it concentrates on electronic research, it is a good idea to
review the basic concepts of law: the hierarchy of authority, validation
by date, and jurisdictional distinctions of mandatory v. persuasive.
II. Chapter Six Objectives
After studying this chapter you should be able to:
1.
Describe resources available for conducting factual and legal
research.
2.
Construct and complete electronic research using the Internet.
3.
Use the Internet to update research.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
Owen Mason as the senior partner and Mrs. Hannah, his office
manager and administrator, were reviewing the expenses trying to
find ways to reduce some of the costs of running two offices.
With a number of major cases in litigation the cash availability
resources were strained. They were spending money on
investigations and staff costs that would not be recovered until
after cases settled or trial concluded with a positive verdict.
With a major case in litigation, the potential fees were high,
but they had to survive until then. The traditional libraries
maintained at both locations was a major item on the budget, as
was the online research costs of subscription services everyone
had been trained to use in law school and paralegal school. They
concluded they would have to propose, to the other partners, the
elimination of as much of the paper-based library as possible.
Each of the online legal research services offered a range of
plans that allowed access to most of the needed legal research.
Free online legal research sites were also used with frequency.
The decision to add high-speed Internet access for everyone
seemed to be a good decision. Much of the investigative material
needed in cases was available online and the internet was
becoming a standard method of communication with clients,
outside experts, and opposing counsel. |
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. What types of issues would need to be researched for a
plaintiff in a
-
torts case
-
contracts case.
2. What might a defense legal team need to research? |
|
Scenario Case Study Questions |
|
1. |
If the students have access to a paid database, you could pose a
research question, such as locating a Supreme Court case, and
ask them to research it in both the paid database and a
government site, such as the Supreme Court website. This might
provide some material for the memo. A similar exercise can be
done with state statutes, if available through a government
site, and contrast that to using a hard copy code with pocket
parts and/or a legislative update. Is the validation easier
online? Is it as or more current? |
III. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRONIC RESEARCH
|
Goal of research: Finding information.
Traditional methods: Paper records and books. |
|
ELECTRONIC RESEARCH
|
Information accessible over the Internet.
·
Legal Research:
Full-service providers: Provide range of materials including
cases, statutes, and regulations; examples Lexis, Loislaw,
Westlaw.
Limited-service providers: Offer a limited range of materials,
other limitations may include limited range of dates of
available cases.
·
Factual Research
Factual investigation: Determine the facts of a case.
Internet factual research: Using the Internet to obtain items
such as aerial photographs, reports, and periodical accounts.
·
Creating a Research Plan
Set up the research plan.
Write accurate search queries.
Use a checklist to analyze the case.
·
Electronic Search Engines
Search engine: A program designed to take a word or set of words
and search websites.
Free search engines: Examples include Google.com, Ask.com,
Yahoo.com, Netscape.com
·
Law-Related Search Resources
Generally charge a fee except for very limited access.
·
Online Resources
Availability of information: New sources of information are
added daily.
Legal-oriented: Examples include FindLaw.com, Legal Information
Institute at Cornell University School of Law.
Non-legal–oriented: One example is the National Institutes of
Health – National Library of Medicine website.
·
Bookmarks and Favorites
Bookmarks and favorites: Lists of frequently used Web addresses
that are saved within an Internet browser, called bookmarks by
Netscape and favorites by Internet Explorer. |
|
METHODS OF CONDUCTING A SEARCH
|
·
Database Searches
Databases are repositories of data requiring a search query.
·
Conducting a Search
Requires selecting a computer search index and creating a query.
Requires a combination of words and phrases of the appropriate
words and legal terms as used in the index by the publisher of
the material where the information is stored.
·
Creating a Computer Search Query
Requires a combination of words and phrases of the appropriate
words and legal terms as used in the index by the publisher of
the material where the information is stored; most productive
searches contain a combination of words.
·
Using Connectors
Connectors are instructions to the search engine to look for
documents containing combinations of words. Connectors include
and, or, and not.
|
|
UPDATING LEGAL RESEARCH
|
·
Use of Current Law
The legal team must always use the most current statutory and
case law.
·
Tools for Updating Legal Research
Electronic methods include the use of
Loislaw’s GlobalCite, Westlaw’s KeyCite, VersusLaw’s V.Cite, and
LexisNexis’ Shepard’s. |
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
A general question, with lots of different answers, usually
involving locating legal or factual resources, evaluating the
source for accuracy & currency, and bookmarking reliable sites.
|
|
2. |
What kind of research? Legal locates authority, primary or
secondary, upon which to base an argument. Factual locates
unknown information or verifies (disputes?) “known facts”. |
|
3. |
The book contains several suggestions, but beginning with the
most local law school library site is a good way to focus on
state-specific information. |
|
4. |
Again, there’s a list in the book, although checking the
students for their suggestions may bring you new information! |
|
5. |
Since it’s counterintuitive, be sure to check that “and” narrows
a search, while “or” broadens it. |
|
6. |
This can focus on many aspects, but perhaps the reliability of
information needs to be stressed, and private v.
governmental/educational ones. |
|
7. |
Most students are familiar with pocket supplements &
Shepardixing, so perhaps this should focus on the difference
between a paid database & a government site. Stress the need to
check to see the effective date of the postings. |
|
8. |
If possible, run a “natural language” & terms and connectors
search for a single case or statute. Have the students
compare. A comparable exercise is to have them perform a
regular Google.com search and then transpose it into the
Advanced Google format. |
|
9. |
Discuss the time factor of searching from scratch, and good
starting pages for a variety of legal searches, like findlaw,
cornell, and the local law school and/or bar association. There
may also be a local law librarians’ association that has dozens
of helpful links. |
Terms & Definitions
|
Search queries |
A combination of appropriate words and terms that identify the
information desired |
|
Full-service online providers |
Computer research services—Lexis, Loislaw, and Westlaw—provide a
broad range of legal materials, including cases, statutes, and
regulations. |
|
Limited-service search providers |
Specialize in providing cases and limited access to additional
items, such as the Code of Federal Regulations |
|
Factual research |
Learning all the facts about a case and finding case-related
resources. |
|
Search engines |
Program designed to take a word or set of words and
search websites on the
Internet. |
|
Bookmarks |
Netscape, Internet browsers has a feature for saving the URL or
Internet addresses of frequently used sites. |
|
Favorites |
Internet Explorer, Internet browser has a feature for saving the
URL or Internet addresses of frequently used sites. |
|
Database |
Repository of all kinds of information or data. |
|
Full-text retrieval |
The search you create searches this index. VersusLaw retrieval
method that searches every word except "stop words. |
|
Stop words |
Words that are used too commonly in documents to be used in a
search, such as the, not, of, and and.
|
|
Connectors |
Instructions to the search engine to look for documents
containing combinations of words. |
|
Precedent |
The American legal system concept of stare decisis
provides that we use prior case law, but change the law as
American society changes. |
|
Shepardizing |
The process of using Shepard's to check legal citations came to
be called |
Chapter Seven
Evidence
Notes
Although the Rules of Evidence may be addressed in other areas of your
curriculum, this chapter seeks to integrate the question of what is
needed & permitted in court into the process of trial preparation. It
focuses on both the trial and the attorney’s responsibility to introduce
or object to evidence, as well as on the paralegal’s responsibilities of
obtaining, handling, organizing and characterizing the evidence needed.
II. Chapter Seven Objectives
After studying this
chapter, you should be able to:
1.
Define evidence.
2.
Explain the reasons for not using some evidence in trial.
3. Use
the Federal Rules of Evidence to find relevant rules of evidence.
4.
Explain why certain items are not admissible as evidence.
5.
Identify items that might be used to challenge the credibility of a
witness.
6.
Describe documentary evidence and the reason for the best evidence rule.
7.
Identify type of hearsay evidence and the important exceptions to the
hearsay rule
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
The law firm of Mason, Marshall, and Benjamin had divided up the
work on the personal injury case so that both offices could be
as efficient as possible. Ethan Benjamin, and his associate
Cary, was heading up the legal team concerned with proving the
defendants were negligent. Owen Mason and Ariel Marshall took on
the task of proving the extent of the injuries and the damages
issues. The initial problem was proving the cause of action and
avoiding a motion for summary judgment. If the case got past the
proof of negligent conduct then showing the extent of the
injuries and getting as much sympathy from the jury was the goal
on the way to a major monetary verdict. Emily, the paralegal in
the suburban office, expressed some concerns about the graphic
nature of the photographs, rhetorically asking if they might
bias the jury and not get sympathy. She had shared with her
sister Caitlin, the paralegal working on the negligence side of
the case, the evidence her team had and was thinking of using.
It was the disagreement on the impact of the photos that raised
the question of admissibility. The lawyers had to decide on
strategy. |
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. What are the trial preparation duties of a litigation
paralegal with regards to evidence?
2. What duties might a paralegal have in the courtroom with
regards to evidence? |
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO EVIDENCE |
Evidence includes testimony, documents, and tangible things that
tend to prove or disprove a fact. Only admissible evidence may
be offered in a trial. |
|
EVIDENCE AND TRIAL STRATEGY |
Trial strategy requires planning the presentation of the case
including an evaluation of admissible evidence and deciding
which particular pieces will have the most positive impact on
the jury. |
|
INTRODUCTION TO THE RULES OF EVIDENCE |
Evidence in federal cases is determined under the Federal Rules
of Evidence. |
|
ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
|
To be admissible, evidence must be relevant, tending to prove
the existence of facts that are important to the resolution of a
case, reliable, trustworthy, and real, not based on imaginary or
hypothetical situations.
To be admissible, evidence must also have probative value that
outweighs any prejudicial value the evidence may have, such as
pictures that are particularly bloody or gory.
Some evidence is not admissible because it tends to prejudice
the decision of the jury in situations in which the social
benefit accomplished by the action outweighs the value, such as
making repairs, paying medical expenses, and having liability
insurance. |
|
TYPES OF EVIDENCE |
Evidence includes testimony of witnesses, physical objects, and
demonstrative evidence such as photographs, models, and display
boards.
Witness testimony is given in an organized manner with the party
calling the witness asking the questions first on direct
examination and the opposing party then cross-examining the
witness in an attempt to raise questions about the credibility
of the witness. Redirect examination follows the
cross-examination to allow a party calling the witness to
rehabilitate the witness subject to recross-examination if any
new areas of testimony are offered.
Lay witnesses present testimony about personal knowledge and are
sometimes called eyewitnesses because of what they have observed
as it relates to the case. Anyone may be called as a lay
witness who has in some way observed, heard, or otherwise sensed
some fact relevant to the case.
Expert witnesses are used to guide the finders of fact in areas
that are beyond the usual expertise or knowledge of the finders
of fact such as the judge or jury. |
|
TANGIBLE EVIDENCE |
Tangible evidence refers to the physical items that may be
presented at trial, including writings, recordings, photographs,
X-rays, and other electronic recording or the compilations.
Generally, to be offered, documentary evidence must be the
original writing, recording, or photograph under the best
evidence rule. Where the original documents are not available,
copies may be used under appropriate authentication such as use
of documents which are self-authenticating, like public
documents or certified copies of official business records.
Physical evidence is those tangible items that give rise to the
cause of action. Precautions to preserve the chain of custody
and prevent spoliation are required. |
|
THE HEARSAY RULE |
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of
the statement in court that was made by someone not in the
court. Hearsay is generally not admissible because it is not
reliable, and the party who made the statement is not available
to be examined or cross-examined. Some hearsay is admissible,
where the utterance or statement was made under circumstances,
which tends to be cases where people tell the truth: an excited
utterance made after a startling event; statements made to a
doctor or medical provider for treatment; or documents, which
are created in the regular course of business, by public
officials or government agencies, documents in the form of
family or ancient records. |
|
RAISING OBJECTIONS |
Unless objections are made in trial, contemporaneous with the
offer of evidence, the objection to the introduction is waived
and may not be raised in the future. |
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
Evidence tends to prove or disprove a legal claim. Admissible
evidence has been limited by public policy, since using some
evidence tends to discourage behavior society considers
beneficial, such as repairing dangerous conditions, or paying
medical bills. |
|
2. |
Facts generally refer to verifiable events, present or past. |
|
3. |
Since each element must be proven, each element requires either
evidence or an admission in order to meet the minimum, prima
facie case requirements in order to stay in court &
ultimately win the case. |
|
4. |
Generally, by case law within the jurisdiction. |
|
5. |
Relevant, reliable, real |
|
6. |
Having a tendency to prove or disprove a claim. |
|
7. |
Credibility relies upon consistency, detail & perspective (the
ability to observe what happened, and relate it coherently).
Expert witness credibility largely relies on credentials. |
|
8. |
Things. |
|
9. |
How far it goes towards proving a point (lower value = less
useful). |
|
10. |
See 1. |
|
11. |
See 1. |
|
12. |
See 1. |
|
13. |
Deep pockets = larger judgments, if it serves to relieve the
jury’s concern about irrevocably harming the defendant with a
large judgment. |
|
14. |
To impress upon them the solemnity of the undertaking, and to
invoke perjury penalties. |
|
15. |
Plaintiffs go first, since, if they fail to prove their case,
the defense need not go forth. |
|
16. |
The other side’s examination of a witness, limited to the scope
of direct exam, but permitting the use of leading questions. |
|
17. |
To rehabilitate the witness |
|
18. |
Should mention the process of qualifying an expert. |
|
19. |
In addition to educating the legal team & providing proof of a
claim, the need to make complex scientific information
accessible to a jury should be mentioned. |
|
20. |
When describing something of which they have personal knowledge,
witnesses can offer some types of opinions -- the car was going
fast, the defendant appeared angry. |
|
21. |
Usually only when the witness is unavailable. “Talking heads”
are very boring. |
|
22. |
All part of tracking “leads” for investigation, corroboration. |
|
23. |
To undermine the weight the jury gives that information. |
|
24. |
See the chart in the book. |
|
25. |
To demonstrate the reputation for a particular trait, not to
prove he or she is a good person. |
|
26. |
Encouraged offering authentic, not doctored, evidence. QUERY:
What is an original document of an ether-based communication? |
|
27. |
Unless the authenticity of a document is questioned, copies are
generally accepted. |
|
28. |
Government records are the broad category – the is no
presumption that the record-keeper had any intent to falsify. |
|
29. |
If destruction was intentional, or even reckless, the
presumption would be that that evidence was harmful to the
spoliator. |
|
30. |
Tampering can be claimed, and the chain of evidence permits
testimony from each link. |
|
31. |
An out-of-court statement, offered to prove the truth of the
matter asserted. |
|
32. |
Generally, most anything that would not have been prepared in
self-serving anticipation of litigation. |
|
33. |
“Use it, or lose it.” Without an objection on the record, the
issue is considered waived. |
VII. Terms & Definitions
|
Evidence |
Includes testimony, documents and tangible things that tend to
prove or disprove a fact. |
|
|
Admissible evidence |
Which is relevant to the case and which the court will
allow to be presented. |
|
|
Fact |
Event or occurrence. |
|
|
Federal rules evidence |
Enacted in 1975, the purposes of rules of evidence are to
promote fairness in the courtroom, eliminate unnecessary expense
and delay, and ensure that proceedings are justly decided |
|
|
Relevant evidence |
Tends to prove the existence of facts that are important to the
resolution of a case. |
|
|
Reliable evidence |
That which is trustworthy. |
|
|
Physical evidence |
any evidence introduced in a trial in the form of a physical
object, intended to prove a fact in issue based on its
demonstrable physical characteristics. |
|
|
Real evidence |
Is an object that is pertinent to the issues in the lawsuit.
|
|
|
Probative value |
Evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something
important in a trial. However, probative value of proposed
evidence must be weighed against prejudice in the minds of
jurors toward the opposing party or criminal defendant.
|
|
|
Prejudice |
A
forejudgment; bias; partiality; preconceived opinion. A leaning
toward one side of a cause for some reason other than a
conviction of its justice. |
|
|
Inadmissible evidence |
Evidence is relevant, reliable and real but may mislead or
confuse the jury, create some emotional reaction, or result in
unfair prejudice. |
|
Chapter Eight
Settlement &
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Notes
Although students frequently equate case preparation with trial
preparation, it is important to demonstrate that case preparation is
more often settlement preparation. Although there are some minor
variations in the types of information & presentation required, the
reality is that preparation for trial is an indication of a failure to
settle the dispute.
As ADR techniques become more popular, in light of the costs of
litigation in both time & money, paralegals are central to the process.
Several of the large arbitration & mediation organizations use
paralegals as case managers, providing support to those who seek to
settle a dispute with binding arbitration, or seek to resolve
differences with skilled mediation.
II. Chapter Eight Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1.
Describe the advantage of a settlement of a lawsuit instead of a trial.
2.
Prepare a settlement brochure.
3.
Prepare the documentation to terminate a lawsuit on the docket of
the court.
4.
Describe the methods of alternative dispute resolution.
III. Scenario
|
Opening Scenario |
Questions & Exercises |
|
The partners, Mr. Mason, Ms. Marshall, and Mr. Benjamin, were
having their regular monthly meeting in the suburban office. In
addition to routine management issues they regularly reviewed
the status of the various cases that they were handling. A
common point of discussion with regard to the various cases they
were handling had become whether they should attempt to settle
the cases early in the handling of the matter. One of the issues
was their limited resources and available personnel. It was
obviously less costly to settle cases than to prepare them for
trial and ultimately try them in court. They were all in
agreement that they owed a duty to their clients to attain the
best possible settlements and not allow their own personal
financial and personnel constraints dictate how a case would be
handled.
Having had the discussion, which they had had many
times before, they turned to a review of the biggest case they
currently had involving a school bus in which a number of
children were injured. The liability seemed clear both to them,
and apparently to the attorneys representing the defendants in
the case. In making preliminary offers of settlement the defense
attorneys raised the issue of the impact on the children if they
were forced to relive the accident and their injuries in open
court. Balancing the ability to settle the case for a fair and
reasonable amount
against the potential for a full trial, they felt they needed to
investigate alternatives to going to trial while at the same
time rejecting what they deemed to be inadequate offers to
settle the case. |
Pre-Chapter Review
Based on your students’ current level of knowledge:
1. When does a case settle?
2. What is the difference between arbitration & mediation? |
IV. Summary
|
INTRODUCTION TO SETTLEMENTS AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION |
Most cases are settled in an informal negotiation or through the
use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). |
|
SETTLEMENTS |
Settlements eliminate the expense, both monetary and
psychological, and the uncertainty of trial. Judges favor
settlements before trial and frequently help to negotiate a
settlement between the parties.
A settlement may occur at any time prior to or after the
initiation of the lawsuit.
There is no single method of negotiation used and therefore
every case must be properly prepared for trial if a settlement
cannot be reached. |
|
DAMAGES |
Special damages are those damages that can be easily calculated
and include expenses for out-of-pocket costs associated with the
injury and lost wages.
General damages are losses, non-economic in nature, that the law
presumes follows from the type of injuries sustained and are not
subject to easy calculation.
Liability is the legal responsibility for the plaintiff's
damages. Without proof of liability there can be no recovery of
damages. |
|
SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS |
Settlement letters are informal demands to settle a case made by
letter.
Seller brochures are more formal presentations detailing the
facts of the case, the injuries sustained, the damages and a
demand for settlement.
Settlement brochures will frequently contain photographs,
day-in-the-life representations of how the injury has affected
the plaintiff either in still photographs or in video, and an
evaluation of the case, which is the basis for the demand to
settle. |
|
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS |
Only the attorney may make a recommendation to the client with
regard to settlement. Paralegals must have specific
authorization for any actions taken during the negotiation
process. |
|
TERMS OF A SETTLEMENT |
A settlement is a contract between the parties to resolve or end
the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs frequently demand an amount substantially higher than
they are willing to accept in settlement, and defendants’ offers
are substantially lower than they are willing to pay to settle
the case. Some of negotiation involves agreeing to a number
somewhere between the original offer and the original demand.
Occasionally the settlement may be non-monetary, and involve the
performance or refraining from performing some act.
Settlements involving minors and other incapacitated persons may
need to be approved by the court even when settled through adult
court methods.
Releases are documents used to settle cases where one or both
parties agrees to release the other from any and all claims
arising from the transaction or occurrence. They may be
individual or mutual releases.
Cases settled prior to suit frequently have a confidentiality
clause included, in which the parties agree to keep the terms of
the dispute and settlement confidential.
Where a case has been settled after the institution of suit, it
must be marked as settled in the court records. In the federal
courts, this is done by filing a notice of dismissal or a
stipulation signed by all the parties or by the entry of a
consent judgment. A notice of dismissal may be used where no
answer has been filed to the complaint and only the plaintiff
need sign. A stipulation of dismissal may be used where the
parties desire the details not be made public. A consent
judgment may be entered upon agreement of the defendant giving
the plaintiff a priority standing against others to maintain
judgments against the same defendant. |
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
|
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a method of
resolving disputes without using the traditional court system.
Cases are heard by independent, neutral parties.
Arbitration involves use of a neutral third party or
parties who hear the case and make a decision, called an award.
Mediation is a form of negotiation where the parties to
the dispute use a neutral third party to assist them in reaching
a settlement.
Mini-trial is a voluntary private proceeding where an
abridged version of the case is presented to representatives of
the parties who have authority to settle the case.
Neutral fact-finding involves a third party hired to
investigate technical facts and report their findings.
In some jurisdictions the courts impose ADR in the form of
arbitration, which is usually mandatory though the parties have
the right to appeal.
Most ADR is done privately. The largest private
organization is the American Arbitration Association.
The Federal Arbitration Act provides that arbitration
agreements in commercial contracts are valid, irrevocable, and
enforceable except under very limited circumstances. Many states
have adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act, which is similar to
the Federal Arbitration Act at the state level.
|
Answers to Review Questions & Exercises
|
1. |
Settlement, either at the time of the incident, or after some
contact with insurance companies, or after a demand letter is
sent. ADR can be mentioned for some kinds of disputes. NOTE:
on-line dispute resolution sites are interesting for students to
visit. They may be able to actually assist in mediating a
dispute! |
|
2. |
Establishing a settlement range: could introduce the concept of
BATNA, or Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement, which
places a value on the cost of going to trial. |
|
3. |
Can be time & money, but may be in ongoing relationships, such
as between a supplier & manufacturer in a contract dispute. |
|
4. |
Could be shying away from a public record, in addition to the
usual time & money rationale. |
|
5. |
Discovery should prevent much surprise, but there are always
unexpected responses, credibility issues, jury appeal, and the
occasional unexpected judicial ruling. |
|
6. |
The client, with the advice of the attorney. |
|
7. |
See #4. |
|
8. |
Not unless liability is provable, and there are no policy
exceptions. |
|
9. |
Judicial economy – time & money. |
|
10. |
Speed, privacy, reduced costs, and a firm’s reputation for
bargaining in good faith, only pursuing legitimate claims. |
|
11. |
Work towards the middle. |
|
12. |
Documentable damages. |
|
13. |
Pain & suffering are examples of these, more speculative
damages. |
|
14. |
A cost/benefit analysis helps identify the costs & probably
recovery. |
|
15. |
Lost profits, specific performance, etc. |
|
16. |
No duty to “make whole” if there is no legal responsibility for
the injury. |
|
17. |
The settlement letter may be a simple demand with cursory
support, while the settlement brochure will have detailed
damages & causation support. |
|
18. |
This helps determine the before/after changes in order to
determine what is needed to make the π whole. |
|
19. |
None. The paralegal assists the attorney in preparing for
settlement, and may act as a conduit of information to the
client, but cannot advise. |
|
20. |
A confidentiality clause may be written into the agreement. |
|
21. |
Blocks further suits based on possible counterclaims. |
|
22. |
Dismissal, release, consent judgments. |
|
23. |
The priority interest it creates in
Δ’s
property |
|
24. |
Should look at the two tracks: final settlement (voluntary or
binding arbitration, for instance) or settlement encouragement
(mediation or Early Neutral Evaluation, for instance). |
|
25. |
The third-party decision-maker renders a final decision &
award. The UAA makes most bargained-for arbitration agreements
enforceable. |
Terms & Definitions
|
Settlements |
Eliminate the expense and uncertainty of trial. |
|
Dockets |
A record of cases that are filed with the court. |
|
Reserve |
An amount the companies must show as a contingent or potential
liability on their corporate financial statements |
|
Settlement negotiations |
Process in which the attorneys (and sometimes an insurance
adjuster with authority to pay a settlement amount on behalf of
the company's insured defendant) and the parties agree to terms
of settlement. |
|
Damages |
Paralegal may assist with identifying and itemizing all of
damages suffered by plaintiff. |
|
Special damages |
Are readily calculated such as lost wages, medical bills and the cost
of hiring a cleaning service to perform the plaintiff’s regular
household duties.
|
|
General damages |
Those that do not need to be specially claimed or proven. |
|
Preliminary value |
The total of the special and estimated general damages. |
|
Liability |
Legal responsibility for the plaintiff’s damages. |
|
Settlement brochure |
Contains the same information as the demand letter presented in
a different format. |
|
Attorney work product |
Material prepared for litigation. |
|
Work product doctrine |
Rules of discovery will ultimately require the disclosure of
documents, photographs, and witnesses’ statements. The legal
team’s legal research and trial strategy are not discoverable. |
|
Settlement demand letter |
States a legal claim which makes a demand for restitution or
performance of some obligation, owing to the recipients' alleged
breach of contract, or for a legal wrong. |
|
Settlement offers |
A
communication from one party to the other suggesting a
settlement - an agreement to end the lawsuit before a judgment
is rendered. |
|
Release |
Document, which is signed by the plaintiff in which the
plaintiff states that the defendant is released from all
possible claims arising out of a certain contract, accident, or
other occurrence in exchange for the payment of a sum of money. |
|
Mutual release |
With both the plaintiff and defendant agreeing to release each
other from any and all claims arising from the transaction or
occurrence that gave rise to the dispute. |
|
Notice of dismissal |
Used when no answer to the complaint was filed, and only the
plaintiff signs the notice of dismissal. |
|
Stipulation |
An agreement or concession made by parties in a judicial
proceeding (or by their attorneys) relating to the business
before the court; must be in writing unless they are part of the
court record |
|
Consent judgment |
The defendant agrees to a judgment being entered on the court
docket for a particular sum. The consent judgment might be used
where the agreed sum is expected to be paid out over an extended
period of time. |
|
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) |
Alternative to resolution of disputes using the traditional
court system. |
|
Arbitration |
Perhaps the most well- known ADR technique and generally denotes
submission of a dispute to a third-party for binding or
non-binding resolution after a hearing in which each side
presents evidence and argument of counsel. |
|
Mediation |
Non-binding structured process in which the mediator helps the
participants reach a negotiated settlement of their differences. |
|
Mini-trial |
Form of non-binding settlement proceeding developed to resolve
disputes between business entities. |
|
Neutral Fact finding |
ADR technique developed by the courts -- notably the United
States District Courts for the Southern and Northern Districts
of California -- to assist parties in settling their cases early
on in the litigation. |
|
Private ADR |
Many contracts for consumer goods, real estate sales, cell phone
service, or cruise line tickets have a clause that requires
disputes be resolved through arbitration, frequently binding
arbitration. |
|
American Arbitration Association |
The AAA is a private nonprofit organization providing lists of
potential arbitrators for the parties to select from and a set
of rules for conducting the private arbitration. |
|
Federal Arbitration Act |
Provides that arbitration agreements in commercial contracts are
valid, irrevocable, and enforceable unless some legal or
equitable (fraud, duress) grounds exist to invalidate them. |
|
Uniform Arbitration Act |
Similar to the Federal Arbitration Act. The Act describes the
procedures that must be followed for arbitration to be
initiated, how the panel of arbitrators is to be selected, and
the procedures for conducting arbitration hearings.
|
Chapter Nine
Pleadings:
Complaint, Summons, and Service
Notes
II. Chapter Nine Objectives
After studying this
chapter you should be able to:
1.
Select the appropriate court rules for preparing pleadings in civil
litigation.
2.
Draft a complaint and summons.
3.
Create a timeline for litigation.
4.
Determine the rules for filing and serving the initial pleadings.
5.
Draft amended or supplementary pleadings.
|